What happens next Where's my refund? Best CD rates this month Shop and save 🤑
Antitrust Laws

Hormel, Tyson, Smithfield and other major pork producers accused of price-fixing

Zlati Meyer
USA TODAY
A lawsuit filed in federal court on Thursday accuses some of the country's largest pork producers of price-fixing.

If you've bought ham, sausage, bacon or other pork products anytime since 2009, you may have overpaid.

That's the allegation contained in a lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court in Minnesota, accusing some of the nation's biggest pork producers of conspired to fix prices.

The suit, filed by 13 grocery shoppers, claims pork processors shared private information about their companies with their competitors through an agricultural data service called Agri Stats. By monitoring each other’s production – current and forward-looking sensitive details like profits, costs, prices and slaughter information – they were able to control supply and price, the suit says.

More:Desk, swivel chair, trees: Why companies are moving the office outdoors

More:Should you invest in a retirement annuity? 4 key points to consider

More:Bigger, better, faster: Let technology lead the way for your small business

The defendants are Agri Stats; Hormel Foods; Smithfield Foods; Tyson Foods; Clemens Foods, whose brands include Hatfield and Farm Promise; Indiana Packers, sold in stores as Indiana Kitchen; JBS USA; Seaboard Foods, known for its Prairie Fresh line; and Triumph Foods. Together, the suit says they control more than 80% of the $20 billion wholesale pork market.

Agri Stats, Clemens, Indiana Packers, JBS USA, Seaboard Foods and Triumph Foods didn't responded to requests for reaction to the suit.

Tyson said it hadn't received formal notice of the lawsuit and couldn't comment.

Hormel said that it's "a 127-year-old global branded food company with a reputation as one of the most respected companies in the food industry. We are confident that any allegations such as these are completely without merit. We intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit."

In an e-mail, Smithfield's senior vice president of corporate affairs, Keira Lombardo, called the company "long-established... with a family of well-loved brands that millions of consumers enjoy. Our products are priced fairly and competitively and we will vigorously defend the erroneous allegations in this lawsuit suggesting otherwise."

The law firm representing the plaintiffs, Hagens Berman, says it is trying to find other consumers who bought pork or pork products, like Ball Park Franks, Hillshire Farm, Jennie-O, Jimmy Dean, Nathan's Famous, Spam and Steak-eze. 

"We want the market to operate, so consumers get to decide what products they want to buy," said Michael Carrier, an antitrust expert at Rutgers University School of Law, who was reached for comment. "When competitors get together and agree how much output will be, what the price will be, they are evading the economic system that’s at the heart of this country."

Follow USA TODAY reporter Zlati Meyer on Twitter: @ZlatiMeyer

Featured Weekly Ad