Introduction

The rapid advancement in homogeneous photocatalysis has primarily relied on the employment of one-photon-absorbing photosensitizers, such as ruthenium polypyridyl complexes1,2, cyclometalated iridium complexes3, and organic dyes4,5,6. In all of these examples, the photosensitizers are excited by either ultraviolet (UV) or visible light (in most cases blue light) to their excited states with competent energy and lifetime to drive organic transformations7. It is very rare to employ near-infrared (NIR) light in conventional one-photon-absorbing photocatalysis, because of the low energy and short lifetime of the excited states that are obtained under NIR light excitation. However, the utilization of UV/visible photons presents several intrinsic limitations such as poor penetration through reaction media8,9, competing absorption by species involved in reaction10,11,12, and incompatibility against substrates bearing light-sensitive functionalities13, as well as limited coverage of the solar spectrum. Therefore, the exploration of NIR light-driven photocatalysis is critical to avoid most of the aforementioned drawbacks of UV/visible light irradiation.

Because of the lower energy of NIR photons relative to UV/visible photons, energy must be harvested from two (or more) NIR photons to produce the desired excited state. One strategy to achieve this scenario is triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Indeed, it was recently demonstrated that NIR light-absorbing sensitizers can be used to activate suitable annihilators for homogeneous photocatalysis14,15,16. Nevertheless, the success of triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion relies on the fine state energy matching and spatial interaction of sensitizers and annihilators, potentially limiting its use due to its complex nature and the availability of suitable sensitizer/annihilator pairs. An alternative and more straightforward strategy for NIR photocatalysis is through direct two-photon absorption (TPA), wherein a chromophore is capable of simultaneously absorbing two photons in a single step to populate the desired excited state. Even though the TPA phenomenon was predicted by Göppert-Mayer in 193117 and utilized in fields like bioimaging18,19 and photodynamic therapy (PDT)20,21, its application in homogeneous photocatalysis remains very much underexplored, likely due to the small TPA cross sections (σ2) of most photosensitizers suitable for photocatalysis22. For instance, the widely used photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (bpy = 2,2’-bipyridyl) was reported to possess a TPA cross section of only 4.3 GM at 880 nm (1 GM = 10−50 cm4 s photon−1)23, rendering its potential to function as a TPA photosensitizer in the NIR region negligible. Only a handful of TPA systems have been investigated for catalysis, however visible light and/or intense lasers are required as the light source24,25,26,27,28. It should be noted that several multi-photon-absorbing catalytic systems have also been reported, however they either require consecutive absorption of photons by two different species or follow the triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion mechanism29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no reports on simultaneous two-photon absorption by one molecule for organic reactions using inexpensive NIR LEDs (λirr > 700 nm).

Along the continuous efforts in designing novel chromophores with enhanced two-photon absorption, it was found that strong intramolecular charge transfer and superpolarizability may yield high TPA cross section39. For instance, stilbene was measured with σ2 = 12 GM at 514 nm and electron-donating substituents substantially increased the σ2 value40. These early findings raised the interest in developing organic TPA compounds with symmetrical donor–π–acceptor structures. In the meantime, transition metal complexes coordinated with elongated π-conjugation ligands have also been explored for TPA41. For instance, Ru-based TPA complexes have been gradually developed as PDT agents42 and photo-activable compounds43. Unfortunately, the TPA cross sections of most Ru complexes are extremely small (<10 GM)44,45,46, making their utilization in NIR photocatalysis impractical.

We were inspired by a few studies showing that octupolar bipyridyl metal complexes coordinated with bisstyryl-substituted bpy ligands exhibit superpolarizability and TPA cross sections two orders of magnitude higher than that of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in the NIR region47,48,49, some of which were also demonstrated as competent PDT agents upon excitation at 700–800 nm50. Hence, we became interested in exploring the possibility of utilizing Ru complexes coordinated with extended π-conjugation ligands for NIR photocatalysis with TPA excitation. Herein, we report a group of Ru complexes ligated by 4,4’-bisstyryl-2,2’-bipyridine (bpyvp) and its close analogues, that are able to drive various organic reactions in a manner akin to conventional one-photon-absorbing photosensitizers, but absorbing two photons per step in the NIR region (Fig. 1a). Both energy-transfer reactions (e.g., 1O2 reactions) and photoredox reactions (e.g., hydrodehalogenation, C–H cyanation, Ni-catalyzed allylation of aldehydes) can be accomplished by these Ru complexes with excellent yields upon irradiation at 740 nm under ambient conditions. By tuning the ligand ratio between bpy and bpyvp-type ligands, as well as installing electronic-donating (e.g., -OMe) or -withdrawing (e.g., –F) substituents at the para positions of the terminal phenyl groups in bpyvp (Fig. 1b), together with theoretical computation, we are able to rationalize the relationship between the electronic structures of these photosensitizers and their TPA photocatalytic performance, providing guidance for the development of improved TPA photosensitizers for NIR photocatalysis.

Fig. 1: Photocatalytic schemes and molecular structures of representative Ru TPA photosensitizers.
figure 1

a Possible reaction pathways for two-photon-absorbing ruthenium photosensitizers following both energy- and electron-transfer processes. [Ru] ruthenium photosensitizer, SR sacrificial reagent, Sub substrate, Ox oxidation, Red reduction. b Molecular structures of Ru TPA complexes 3, 4, and 5.

Full size image

Results and discussion

Synthesis, physical characterization, and theoretical calculation

Following the reported procedure50, the parent ligand 4,4’-bisstyryl-2,2’-bipyridine (bpyvp-H) was successfully synthesized with an overall yield of 80%. By controlling the ratio between bpyvp-H and the corresponding Ru precursor, we were able to obtain heteroleptic [Ru(bpy)2(bpyvp-H)]2+ (1), [Ru(bpy)(bpyvp-H)2]2+ (2), and homoleptic [Ru(bpyvp-H)3]2+ (3) in decent yields. The fluorine- and methoxyl-substituted ligands, bpyvp-F and bpyvp-OMe, were synthesized in a similar fashion as bpyvp-H. Hence, two additional homoleptic Ru complexes, [Ru(bpyvp-F)3]2+ (4) and [Ru(bpyvp-OMe)3]2+ (5), were also synthesized (Supplementary Figs. 1–9).

The photophysical and electrochemical properties of 1–5 are summarized in Table 1 and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ is included for comparison. It is apparent that as the number of bpyvp-H ligands is increased in these Ru complexes, the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) band red shifts from 465 nm in 1 (Supplementary Fig. 10), 475 nm in 2 (Supplementary Fig. 11), to 477 nm in 3 (Supplementary Fig. 12), together with a two-fold increase in the extinction coefficient (ε). The presence of the fluorine substituents in 4 does not substantially alter its absorption (Supplementary Fig. 13) relative to that of 3, while a further red shift in the MLCT band and increased ε are observed for 5 with methoxy substituents (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 14). In addition to the bpy-centered ππ* transition located around 290 nm, 1–5 present an additional absorption feature in 300–400 nm, whose ε values increase approximately linearly with the number of bpyvp-type ligands (52–143 × 103 M−1 cm−1). Therefore, these absorption bands are tentatively assigned to bpyvp-based ππ* and/or intraligand charge transfer transitions. Supplementary Figs. 10–14 also present the emission of 1–5 with maxima at 660–670 nm, along with the corresponding excitation spectra. The good overlap between the excitation and absorption spectra of each complex confirms that the each emission arises from the target Ru complexes.

Table 1 Photophysical and electrochemical properties of complexes 1–5 compared with [Ru(bpy)3]2+.
Full size table
Fig. 2: Calculated frontier orbitals, absorption, and transient absorption spectra of 5.
figure 2

a Calculated HOMO and LUMO of 5 (Isovalue = 0.04). b Calculated singlet electronic transitions of 5 together with the selected EDDMs (Isovalue = 0.04) of S1, S8, S13, and S22 states (red indicates electron decrease and yellow indicates electron increase). The experimental absorption spectrum (red line) is also included for comparison. c, d Transient absorption spectra of 5 under excitation at 480 nm (c) and 800 nm (d). The inset of (d) plots the relationship between the transient absorption signal density at 500 nm and square of the excitation light power.

Full size image

Cyclic and linear sweep voltammograms of 1–5 (Supplementary Figs. 15–19) reveal four reversible redox couples, one anodic feature within the +0.62 to +0.77 V vs Fc+/0 (Fc: ferrocene) range and three reduction couples between −1.62 and −2.12 V vs Fc+/0. A linear relationship between the peak current and the square root of the scan rate was obtained for each complex, confirming the molecular nature free diffusion of the redox-active species in solution (Supplementary Figs. 15c–19c). The negative shifts of the anodic features of 1–5 relative to that of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (+0.80 V vs Fc+/0) can be attributed to the enhanced electron donation from the bpyvp-type ligands. As expected, the extended π conjugation of the bpyvp-type ligands also results in lower-lying LUMOs (lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals), thus leading to anodic shifts of their first reduction potentials as compared to bpy. Indeed, density functional theory (DFT) calculation results (Supplementary Tables 1–5) support the distribution of LUMOs primarily located on the bpyvp-type ligands instead of bpy (see the LUMOs of 1 and 2 in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively) and the energy trend of each LUMO in 1–5 is consistent with their first reduction couples, wherein 5 coordinated with three bpyvp-OMe shows a higher-lying LUMO (Fig. 2a) than that of 3 and thus more negative first reduction potential for the former, −1.67 V vs Fc+/0. The calculated HOMOs of 1–5 are primarily centered on the Ru 4d orbitals with slight contribution from the bpyvp-type ligands, as evidenced by the HOMO of 5 shown in Fig. 2a.

Time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations (Supplementary Tables 6–10) assisted us in understanding the singlet excited states (Sn) of each complex. Taking 5 as an example, its S1 state was calculated at 551 nm and its electron density difference map (EDDM) further confirms its MLCT character with all three bpy components in bpyvp-OMe acting as the charge accepting units. In addition, the prominent S8 state (f = 0.50) of 5 appearing at 512 nm aligns very well with the MLCT band in its UV–vis absorption spectrum (Fig. 2b). Transitions with mixed MLCT and LCCT (ligand-centered charge transfer) character were computed for the singlet excited states of 5 with energies between 350 and 450 nm. For instance, the EDDMs of two dominant states, S13 (f = 0.89) and S22 (f = 0.81), are displayed in Fig. 2b, clearly presenting the contribution of both MLCT and LCCT transitions. Similar singlet excited states of mixed nature were also obtained from the TD-DFT calculation results of complexes 1–4, wherein those bpyvp-type ligands, instead of bpy, more likely acted as the electron density-receiving units, likely due to their extended π-conjugation structures.

Despite the general similarities in one-photon photophysical and electrochemical properties of complexes 1–5 and [Ru(bpy)3]2+51, these complexes are strikingly different in their ability to undergo two-photon absorption (TPA). As shown in Fig. 2c, upon excitation at 480 nm, the transient absorption spectra of 5 show the characteristic MLCT bleach at ~500 nm and excited state absorption in the 400–450 nm range and beyond 550 nm. Importantly, when exciting with 800 nm, a wavelength that complex 5 does not absorb (Fig. 2b), a nearly identical transient absorption spectrum was obtained (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, a linear relationship is observed when the transient absorption signal at 500 nm is plotted versus the square of the excitation power (λirr = 800 nm), shown in the inset of Fig. 2d. Similar results were obtained for the other complexes (Supplementary Figs. 20–22). The fact that analogous transient absorption spectra were collected by excitation at both 480 and 800 nm, together with a linear relationship between the optical density in the transient absorption and the square of excitation power at 800 nm, unambiguously confirm that these Ru complexes indeed possess TPA capability and identical excited states are populated when excited at either 480 or 800 nm.

Photocatalytic 1O2-driven energy transfer reactions under NIR light irradiation

The excited state lifetimes of the homoleptic complexes 3, 4, and 5 in deaerated CH3CN were measured at 431, 628, and 877 ns, respectively (Table 1 and Supplementary Figs. 23–25), which all decreased to ~130 ns in air, consistent with the excited state energy transfer to O2 to generate reactive singlet oxygen 1O2. Given this reactivity, we sought to utilize photocatalytic C–N coupling of benzyl amine as a model reaction to evaluate the photocatalytic performance of these complexes under NIR irradiation. Commercially inexpensive LEDs (λirr = 740 nm, 8.18 W) were employed as the light source in all the following photocatalysis experiments. It is known that benzyl amine can be oxidized by 1O2 to produce N-benzylidenebenzylamine52,53. As shown in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 26–30, a dramatic difference in reaction rate was detected for 1–5. It is apparent that the increasing number of bpyvp is beneficial for the overall photocatalysis, in that the reaction rate follows the order 1 < 2 < 3. Only a 16% yield of N-benzylidenebenzylamine after 2 h irradiation was realized for 1, while benzyl amine was nearly fully converted to N-benzylidenebenzylamine within 100 and 50 min using 2 and 3 as the photosensitizer, respectively. Using 3 as the standard photocatalyst, a series of control experiments (Supplementary Fig. 31) prove that light irradiation, O2, and photosensitizer are all crucial for the success of this reaction (entries 2, 3, and 4 in Fig. 3b). When the reaction is conducted in air, a moderate yield of 43% was obtained within 30 min (entry 5 in Fig. 3b), lower than that measured under O2 (89%). It is interesting to find that 5 is more effective in initiating the benzyl amine C-N coupling than 3, with a yield of 96% for 5 within 30 min upon 740 nm irradiation as compared to 3, which achieved an 89% yield. This difference can be attributed to the longer excited state lifetime of 5, expected to generate a greater amount of 1O2, as well as its higher TPA cross section. In contrast, complex 4, possessing fluorine substituents, only reached a yield of 42% under the same conditions. These results imply that better electron donation from the terminal phenyl group to the metal center, and hence greater intra-molecular charge transfer, can be beneficial for NIR TPA photocatalytic performance. Given the better performance observed for 5, this complex was used as the photosensitizer in all the subsequent photocatalytic experiments unless noted otherwise. A non-linear relationship between the yield of benzyl amine C–N coupling product and the LED power was observed, in agreement with the TPA nature of 5 as the photosensitizer (Supplementary Fig. 32)23,54. The reaction performance upon one-photon (456 nm) versus two-photon (740 nm) irradiation was also compared in Supplementary Figs. 33–35, in which ten reaction tubes were bundled in one row and the irradiation light was only allowed to excite the reaction tubes from the left side while all the other directions were covered by aluminum foil. It was found that the 456 nm LED was only able to achieve a decent yield (90%) in the 1st reaction tube while all the remaining tubes exhibited no conversion at all, due to the limited penetration of the 456 nm light. In striking contrast, the 740 nm LED was able to not only produce nearly 100% yield in the 1st tube, but also decent yields (91–72%) in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th tubes. Even the last tube (#10) also produced a yield of 26%. These results unambiguously demonstrate the advantage of deep penetration of NIR light via two-photon absorption of our photosensitizer 5.

Fig. 3: Photocatalytic 1O2-involved organic reactions using Ru TPA photosensitizers under NIR irradiation.
figure 3

a Yield evolution of benzyl amine homocoupling during photocatalysis using different photocatalysts of 1–5. Condition: 50 mM benzyl amine, 1 mol% of photocatalyst, 5 mL CH3CN, O2 atmosphere, irradiation at 740 nm, room temperature. b Comparison of photocatalytic benzyl amine homocoupling performed under various conditions. c Photocatalytic yields of benzyl amine homocoupling obtained with or without scavengers. Condition: 50 mM benzyl amine, 50 mM scavenger, 1 mol% 5, 5 mL CH3CN, O2, irradiation at 740 nm, room temperature, 10 min. Default without scavenger, AA L-ascorbic acid, DM D-mannitol, SA sodium azide. d Other selected 1O2 reactions: thioanisole sulfoxidation, anthracene [4 + 2] Diels-Alder reaction, and cyclooctene oxidation using 5 as the photocatalyst. e Photocatalytic HMF oxidation by 1O2 to yield maleic acid anhydride (MA) and 5-hydroxy-4-keto-penteroic acid (HKPA) using 5 as the photocatalyst. Condition: 50 mM HMF, 1 mol% 5, 5 mL CH3CN, O2, irradiation at 740 nm, room temperature.

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 3c, the presence of ascorbic acid and D-mannitol, which are O2− and OH−• scavengers, respectively, did not suppress the formation of N-benzylidenebenzylamine appreciably. However, upon the addition of sodium azide, a 1O2 scavenger, the reaction yield decreased from 65% to 5% after 10 min of irradiation at 740 nm. Therefore, these results support the conclusion that 1O2 is the primary oxidant for the homocoupling of benzyl amine, formed from the energy transfer process from the excited photosensitizer (e.g., 5*) to 3O2.

Such an extraordinarily high photocatalytic activity of 5 in 1O2-involved benzyl amine coupling prompted us to explore other NIR light-driven 1O2 reactions, especially because O2 is regarded as a green oxidant. For example, thioanisole sulfoxidation (Supplementary Figs. 36, 37)55, anthracene-1O2 [4 + 2] Diels-Alder reaction (Supplementary Figs. 38, 39)56, and allylic hydroperoxide formation from cyclooctene (Supplementary Figs. 40, 41)57 were smoothly executed with excellent yields (>90%) using 5 as the sole photosensitizer upon 740 nm irradiation under ambient conditions (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, 1O2-driven upgrading of biomass-derived platform chemicals, such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), can also be realized. Electrocatalytic and photocatalytic valorization of HMF has attracted the intense interest of many scientists, including our group. The most common product from HMF oxidation is either 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid58,59,60 or 2,5-diformylfuran61,62, both of which are valuable polymer precursors. In contrast, 1O2-initiated HMF oxidation can result in other value-added fine chemicals, such as maleic acid anhydride (MA) and 5-hydroxy-4-keto-2-pentenoic acid (HKPA), but these reactions remain underexplored63,64. Herein, we demonstrate that using 5 as the photosensitizer, NIR light irradiation (λirr = 740 nm) was able to drive the transformation of HMF to MA (55% yield) and HKPA (37% yield) in the presence of O2 with an overall HMF conversion of 92% within 5 h (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 42). It has been suggested that an ozonide intermediate is formed during the transformation, analogous to the above [4 + 2] Diels-Alder mechanism of anthracene oxidation by 1O2.

Photocatalytic redox reactions under NIR light irradiation

In addition to the above 1O2-involved reactions resulting from an energy transfer process, complex 5 is equally effective in driving electron-transfer photoredox reactions upon 740 nm irradiation. Herein, the hydrodehalogenation of phenacyl bromide was selected as a representative reaction for reductive photocatalysis. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ has been reported as a competent photocatalyst for this reaction under visible light irradiation65, however no product was formed upon irradiation at 740 nm. In striking contrast, phenacyl bromide underwent hydrodehalogenation smoothly in the presence of 0.2 mol% of 5 and 10 equivalents of triethanolamine (TEOA) under 740 nm irradiation in deaerated acetonitrile, in which TEOA was employed as the sacrificial electron/proton donor (Fig. 4a). An 86% yield of acetophenone was obtained after 8 h photocatalysis at room temperature (Supplementary Fig. 43).

Fig. 4: Photocatalytic redox reactions using 5 as the photosensitizer under NIR irradiation.
figure 4

a Photocatalytic hydrodehalogenation of α-bromoketone using 0.2 mol% 5 and 10 eq. TEOA in CH3CN under 740 nm irradiation for 8 h. b Photocatalytic C–H cyanation of tetrahydroisoquinoline using 1 eq. TsCN and 1 mol% 5 in CH3CN under 740 nm irradiation for 24 h. c Photocatalytic allylation of benzaldehydes with 10 eq. allylic acetate using 5 mol% 5, 15 mol% Ni(OTf)2, 20 mol% o-phenanthroline (phen), and 10 eq. DIPEA in CH3CN under 740 nm irradiation for 72 h. All the photocatalytic reactions were performed at room temperature in deaerated solvents under argon.

Full size image

In the absence of sacrificial reagents, 5 is also able to drive redox neutral reactions, which utilizes both the reduction and oxidation power of a photocatalyst and thus maximizes the energy efficiency and atom economy. In this case, C-H cyanation of tetrahydroisoquinoline was selected as a representative reaction, wherein p-toluenesulfonyl cyanide (TsCN) was employed as the cyanide source (Fig. 4b). Upon irradiation at 740 nm, the excited state of 5, 5*, was oxidatively quenched by TsCN to produce [Ru]3+ (one-electron oxidized 5), CN−, and a sulfonyl radical. The resulting [Ru]3+ complex was able to oxidize tetrahydroisoquinoline to yield an aminium radical cation, resulting in the generation of a neutral carbon radical after α-H deprotonation. Subsequent oxidation of the carbon radical by the sulfonyl radical forms an iminium cation and the final nucleophilic attack of CN− to the iminium cation furnished the formation of the cyanation product. Overall, two single-electron transfer processes are required in this photocatalytic cycle and a 96% yield is obtained after 24 h irradiation at 740 nm (Supplementary Figs. 44, 45).

In addition to acting as a sole photocatalyst, 5 can also cooperate with transition metal cocatalysts for metallaphotoredox catalysis under NIR light irradiation. As shown in Fig. 4c, in the presence of Ni2+, o-phenanthroline, and a sacrificial electron donor DIPEA (diisopropylethylamine), 5 was able to initiate the allylation of aromatic aldehydes with allyl acetate under 740 nm excitation. Good to excellent yields (57–87%) were achieved (Supplementary Figs. 46–48), in which the relatively lower yield of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)but-3-en-1-ol (57%) was likely due to the lower electrophilicity of the aldehyde group in 4-methoxybenzaldehyde because of the electron donating capability of its methoxy substituent at the para position. Recently, Ru- and Ir-based one-photon-absorbing photosensitizers have been reported to integrate with Ni66 and Co67 cocatalysts for similar reactions, hence it is anticipated that the current NIR light-driven allylation of aldehydes follows an analogous catalytic cycle (Supplementary Fig. 49). Two single-electron-transfer processes between the reduced Ru photocatalyst and Ni species are responsible for the net reductive Csp2-Csp3 coupling transformation.

In summary, five Ru polypyridyl complexes coordinated by ligands with extended π-conjugation were demonstrated to possess excellent photocatalytic performance under NIR light irradiation following a two-photon absorption strategy. Both energy- and electron-transfer reactions were realized upon excitation by low energy 740 nm photons. Activity analysis of these complexes results in the following findings. (i) A greater number of bpyvp-ligands in coordination sphere of the complex generally led to better TPA photocatalysis, in agreement with the increased TPA cross section (e.g., 3 as compared to 1 and 2). (ii) Electron-donating substituents at the para positions of the terminal phenyl groups in the bpyvp-type ligands are beneficial for the overall photocatalytic performance (e.g., 5 as compared to 3 and 4), likely due to improved intra-molecular charge transfer leading to better two-photon absorption. It is worth noting that 5 also has longer excited lifetime than 3 and 4. (iii) These TPA Ru complexes can perform in an analogous fashion as one-photon-absorbing photosensitizers, such that a wide range of applications can be envisioned for many homogeneous reactions under NIR light irradiation. Finally, because of better penetration into reaction media and less competing absorption by organic substrates when using NIR light, two-photon-absorbing photosensitizers present a new and exciting avenue for homogeneous photocatalysis at large.

Methods

Computational methods

All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 1668 program package employing the DFT method with Becke’s three-parameter hybrid functional and Lee-Yang-Parr’s gradient corrected correlation functional (B3LYP)69,70,71. The Stuttgart/Dresden (SDD) basis set and effective core potential were used for the Ru atom72,73, and 6–31 G* basis set was applied for H, C, O, N and F74. The geometries of the singlet ground states of compounds were optimized in CH3CN using the conductive polarizable continuum model (CPCM). The local minimum on each potential energy surface was confirmed by frequency analysis. Time-dependent DFT calculations produced the singlet excited states of each compound starting from the optimized geometry of the corresponding singlet ground state, using the CPCM method with CH3CN as the solvent. The calculated absorption spectra, electronic transition contributions, and electron density difference maps (EDDMs) were generated by GaussSum 3.075. The electronic orbitals were visualized using VMD 1.9.4a5176.

Materials and instrumentation

All starting materials were commercially available and used without further purification unless otherwise noted. 1H and 13C{1H} and 19F NMR spectra were recorded in the designated solvents on a Bruker AV 400 MHz spectrometer. Absorption spectra were measured using a Cary 8454 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). Emission spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer. Electrochemical measurements were performed on a VMP-3 potentiostat (Biologic Science Instrument) with a three-electrode configuration. Pt wire, Standard Calomel Electrode (SCE), and glassy carbon (GC) were used as the counter, reference, and counter electrode, respectively. All the potentials were calibrated by the redox potential of Fc+/0 (Fc: ferrocene). Cyclic voltammetry and square wave voltammetry experiments were conducted for each complex (1–5) in 0.1 M LiClO4 of DMF. Femtosecond transient absorption spectra were performed on a home-built system. The 800 nm (8 mJ 1 kHz rep. rate, ∼35 fs pulse width) laser beam is generated from an Astrella laser system then split by the Ti:Saph crystal to form the pump beam (3 mJ) and probe beam. The pump beam goes through an optical parametric amplifier (Coherent OPerA Solo) to generate the desire wavelengths (3-4 uJ). Samples are loaded into a flow cell opened to air. All samples were at a concentration that afforded an absorption of ∼0.6 − 0.8 at the sample excitation wavelength. Fluorescence emission decay was measured on a LP980 spectrometer system (Edinburgh Instruments). The 355 nm laser beam is generated by a frequency-tripled Quanta-Ray INDI Nd:YAG laser (Spectra-Physics, ~6 ns pulses at 10 Hz) then goes through a tunable optical parametric oscillator (Spectra-Physics) to output the desired wavelengths, and the white light probe beam is generated from a 150 W Xe arc lamp. Single wavelength emission decay traces were collected using a PMT and digital oscilloscope (Tektronix MDO3022, 200 MHz, 2.5 GS/s). Spectral measurements were collected using an iCCD camera (iStar, Andor Technology). All the air-tight solutions were purged with N2 for 15 min before experiments. The absorbance of the solutions was kept 0.6 − 0.8 at the excited wavelength. The absorption spectra were taken before and after the experiments to confirm no degradation over the measurements.

Synthesis

(E,E’)-4,4’-Bisstyryl]-2,2’-bipyridine (bpyvp-H)

bpyvp-H was prepared according to the reported literature with slight modification50. A solution of 4,4’-dimethyl-2,2’-bipyridine (0.92 g, 5 mmol) and KtOBu (2.3 g, 20 mmol) in dry DMF (50 mL) was stirred for 1 h under Ar. Benzaldehyde (1524.7 μL, 15 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture. After stirring at room temperature for 24 h, the solution was treated with 400 mL water and the suspension was stored at 5 °C for several hours. The precipitated solid was filtered and washed with methanol via Soxhlet extraction for 24 h and dried in vacuum at 60 °C to afford 1.49 g light yellow solid product (yield: 83%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.61 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 8.49 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.22 (m, 5H), 7.08 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 156.7, 149.8, 146.0, 136.5, 133.6, 129.1, 128.9, 127.3, 126.4, 121.3, 118.5.

(E,E’)-4,4’-Bis[p-fluorostyryl]-2,2’-bipyridine (bpyvp-F)

bpyvp-F was synthesized following a similar procedure as the above bpyvp-H. A solution of 4,4’-dimethyl-2,2’-bipyridine (0.92 g, 5 mmol and KtOBu (2.3 g, 20 mmol) in dry DMF (50 mL) was stirred for 1 h under Ar. p-Fluorobenzaldehyde (1609.2 μL, 15 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture. After stirring at room temperature for 24 h, the solution was treated with 400 mL water and the suspension was stored at 5 °C for several hours. The precipitated solid was filtered and washed with methanol via Soxhlet extraction for 24 h and dried in vacuum at 60 °C to afford 1.78 g light yellow solid product (yield: 90%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.68 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 8.55 (s, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 8.6, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.47–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.03 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3):164.4, 161.9, 156.7, 149.8, 145.8, 132.7, 132.4, 128.9, 128.8, 126.11, 121.3, 118.4, 116.2, 116.0. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): -112.3.

(E,E’)-4,4’-Bis(p-methoxystyryl)-2,2’-bipyridine (bpyvp-OMe)

bpyvp-OMe was synthesized following a similar procedure as the above bpyvp-H. A solution of 4,4’-dimethyl-2,2’-bipyridine (0.92 g, 5 mmol) and KtOBu (2.3 g, 20 mmol) in dry DMF (50 mL) was stirred for 1 h under Ar. p-Methoxybenzaldehyde (1823.4 μL, 15 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture. After stirring at room temperature for 24 h, the solution was treated with 400 mL water and the suspension was stored at 5 °C for several hours. The precipitated solid was filtered and washed with methanol via Soxhlet extraction for 24 h and dried in vacuum at 60 °C to afford 1.68 g light yellow solid product (yield: 80%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.65 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.34 (m, 4H), 7.05–6.90 (m, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 160.4, 156.7, 149.7, 146.3, 133.1, 129.3, 128.6, 124.2, 121.1, 118.3, 114.5, 55.6.

[Ru(2,2’-bipyridine)2((E,E’)-4,4’-Bisstyryl)]-2,2’-bipyridine)][PF6]2 (1)

1 was prepared according to the reported literature with slight modification10. A mixture of Ru(bpy)2Cl2 (0.2 mmol, 0.097 g) and bpyvp-H (0.3 mmol, 0.108 g) was suspended in DMF/H2O (v/v, 30/30 mL). The mixture was then refluxed at 100 °C for 8 h under argon atmosphere. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in methanol and added with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6. The red precipitated solid product (1) was filtered and washed with water and diethyl ether with a yield of 46% (98 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ 8.73 (s, 2H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 8.06 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H), 7.83–7.60 (m, 12H), 7.50–7.33 (m, 12H), 7.32 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN): 158.1, 157.9, 152.6, 152.4, 147.7, 138.7, 137.4, 136.7, 130.6, 130.1, 128.5, 128.4, 125.3, 125.2, 125.0, 121.6.

[Ru(2,2’-bipyridine)((E,E’)-4,4’-Bisstyryl)]-2,2’-bipyridine)2][PF6]2 (2)

2 was prepared according to a similar procedure of that of 1. A mixture of bpyvp-H (0.5 mmol, 0.18 g), Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (0.25 mmol, 0.12 g) and lithium chloride (25 mmol, 1.06 g) in dry DMF (30 mL) was refluxed for 5 h under argon atmosphere. The solution was then cooled down to room temperature and water (200 mL) was added. The solid precipitate was filtrated and washed with water and diethyl ether to give the intermediate compound of [Ru((E,E’)-4,4’-bisstyryl-2,2’-bipyridine)2Cl2] without further purification. [Ru((E,E’)-4,4’-Bisstyryl-2,2’-bipyridine)2Cl2] and 2,2’-bipyridine (0.2 mmol, 0.18 g) were suspended in DMF/H2O (v/v, 30/30 mL). The mixture was then refluxed at 100 °C for 8 h under argon atmosphere. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in methanol and added with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6. The dark-red precipitated solid product (2) was filtered and washed with water and diethyl ether with a yield of 67% (170 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ 8.75 (s, 4H), 8.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.60–7.89 (m, 18H), 7.53–7.41 (m, 18H), 7.33 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN): 158.2, 157.9, 152.6, 152.4, 147.6, 138.7, 137.3, 136.8, 130.6, 130.1, 128.5, 128.4, 125.3, 125.2, 125.0, 121.6.

[Ru((E,E’)-4,4’-Bisstyryl)]-2,2’-bipyridine)3][PF6]2 (3)

Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (0.25 mmol, 0.12 g, 1 equiv.) and bpyvp-H (1 mmol, 0.36 g, 4 equiv.) were refluxed in dry ethanol (150 mL) under argon atmosphere for 15 h. After cooling down to the room temperature, the residue solid was filtered off. And the remaining solution was added with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6. The dark-red precipitated solid product (3) was filtered and washed with water and diethyl ether with a yield of 80% (294 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ 8.76 (s, 6H), 7.82–7.74 (m, 12H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 12H), 7.54–7.4 (m, 24H), 7.33 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN): 158.2, 152.4, 147.6, 137.3, 136.8, 130.6, 130.1, 128.4, 125.3, 125.1, 121.6.

[Ru((E,E’)-4,4’-(p-fluorostyryl))]-2,2’-bipyridine)3][PF6]2 (4)

4 was prepared via a similar procedure of that of 3. Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (0.25 mmol, 0.12 g, 1 equiv.) and bpyvp-F (1 mmol, 0.36 g, 4 equiv.) were refluxed in dry ethanol (150 mL) under argon atmosphere for 15 h. After cooling down to the room temperature, the residue solid was filtered off. And the remaining solution was added with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6. The dark-red precipitated solid product (4) was filtered and washed with water and diethyl ether with a yield of 75% (296 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3COCD3): δ 9.04 (s, 6H), 8.12–7.98 (m, 6H), 7.88–7.63 (m, 24H), 7.41 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 6H), 7.27–7.05 (m, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN): 163.0, 158.1, 152.4, 136.0, 133.2 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 130.4 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 125.1 (d, J = 34.5 Hz), 121.5, 117.1, 116.8. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CD3CN): -72.6 (d, J = 704.6 Hz), -112.8.

[Ru((E,E’)-4,4’-(p-methoxystyryl))]-2,2’-bipyridine)3][PF6]2 (5)

5 was prepared via a similar procedure of that of 3. Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (0.25 mmol, 0.12 g, 1 equiv.) and bpyvp-F (1 mmol, 0.36 g, 4 equiv.) were refluxed in dry ethanol (150 mL) under argon atmosphere for 15 h. After cooling down to the room temperature, the residue solid was filtered off. And the remaining solution was added with a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6. A saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6 was added. The dark-red precipitated solid product (5) was filtered and washed with water and diethyl ether with a yield of 73% (303 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): δ 8.68 (s, 6H), 7.71 (m, 12H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 12H), 7.45 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 6H), 7.17 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 6H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 12H), 3.84 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN): 162.0, 158.1, 152.1, 147.9, 136.9, 130.0, 129.4, 124.9, 122.6, 121.2, 118.3, 115.5, 56.1.

Photocatalysis

Benzyl amine C-N coupling

In a typical experiment, a solution of 50 mM benzyl amine and 1 mol% photosensitizer in 5 mL CH3CN was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with O2 for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for a certain period of time to obtain N-benzylidenebenzylamine as the product. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.35 (m, 8H), 4.75 (s, 2H). For scavenger control experiments, the concentration of scavenger was 50 mM, photosensitizer was complex 5 and the reaction time was 10 min. For power dependence experiment, the light source was 730 nm LED (M730L5, Thorlabs) and a 695 nm long-pass filter (SCHOTT RG695) was placed between the LED and the reaction vessel. The LED power was controlled via the LED driver (DC2200, Thorlabs).

Thioanisole sulfoxidation

In a typical procedure, a solution of 50 mM thioanisole and 1 mol% 5 in 4 mL CH3CN and 1 mL methanol was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with O2 for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for a certain period of time to obtain methyl phenyl sulfoxide as the product (yield: 95%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.40 (m, 5H) 2.69 (s, 1H).

Anthracene-O2 [4 + 2] Diels-Alder reaction

In a typical procedure, a solution of 10 mM anthracene and 1 mol% 5 in 5 mL CH3CN was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with O2 for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for a certain period of time to obtain 9,10-dihydro-9,10-epidioxyanthracene as the product (yield: 99%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.56–7.16 (m, 8H) 6.04 (s, 2H).

Cyclooctene ene-type reaction

In a typical procedure, a solution of 50 mM anthracene and 1 mol% 5 in 5 mL CD3CN was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with O2 for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for a certain period of time to obtain 3-hydroperoxycyclooct-1-ene as the final product (yield: 91%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.39 (brs, 1H), 5.75–5.61 (m, 1H), 5.60–5.53 (m, 1H), 4.85–4.69 (m, 1H), 2.29–1.83 (m, 4H), 1.75–1.17 (m, 6H).

HMF upgrading

In a typical procedure, a solution of 50 mM HMF and 1 mol% 5 in 5 mL CH3CN was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with O2 for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for a certain period of time to obtain maleic acid anhydride (yield: 55%) and 5-hydroxy-4-keto-penteroic acid (yield: 37%) as the products. Maleic acid anhydride: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.04 (s, 1H). 5-Hydroxy-4-keto-penteroic acid: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.94 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (s, 1H).

Phenacyl bromide dehalogenation

In a typical procedure, a solution of 50 mM phenacyl bromide, 10 equiv. triethanolamine (TEOA), and 0.2 mol% 5 in 5 mL CH3CN was added in a sealed 20 mL vial. After bubbling with Ar for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for 8 h. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with Vhexanes/Vethyl acetate = 100/3 to afford acetophenone as the product (yield: 86%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.04 – 7.88 (m, 2H), 7.62 – 7.52 (m, 1H), 7.46 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (s, 3H).

Cyanation of tetrahydroisoquinoline

The starting substrate 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline was synthesized based on a published procedure77. A mixture of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (0.63 mL, 5 mmol) and 4-iodoanisole (1.2 g, 5 mmol), copper(I) iodide (95.3 mg, 0.5 mmol), and potassium phosphate (2.1 g, 10 mmol) in 2-propanol/ethylene glycol (20/2, v/v) was refluxed at 80 °C for 24 h under argon atmosphere. After cooling down to room temperature, the mixture was quenched by water (50 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure via rotary evaporation. The obtained residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the white solid product (860 mg, 72%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.19–7.25 (m, overlapped, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.50 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 3.04 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H).

The following photocatalytic cyanation process was conducted in a sealed 20 mL vial containing a solution of 50 mM 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline, 50 mM p-toluenesulfonyl cyanide, and 1 mol% 5 in 5 mL CH3CN. After bubbling with Ar for 10 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for 24 h. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with Vhexanes/Vethyl acetate = 100/3 to afford 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-1-carbonitrile as the product (yield: 96%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.41–7.20 (m, 4H), 7.13–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.88 (m, 2H), 5.37 (s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.64–3.54 (m, 1H), 3.44 (m, 1H), 3.17 (m, 1H), 2.94 (m, 1H).

Ni-assisted Csp 2–Csp 3 coupling

In a typical procedure, a solution of 50 mM para-substituted benzaldehyde (-H, -OCH3, or -CF3), 10 equiv. allyl acetate, 10 equiv. N, N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), 5 mol% 5, 15 mol% Ni(OTf)2, and 20 mol% o-phenanthroline in 2 mL CH3CN was added in a sealed 5 mL vial. After bubbling with Ar for 3 min, the solution was irradiated under near-IR LED (PR160L-740-C, 8.18 W) for 72 h. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with Vhexanes/Vethyl acetate = 10/1 to afford para-substituted 1-phenyl-3-buten-1-ol as the product (yield: 57 – 87%). 1-phenyl-3-buten-1-ol: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.41–7.22 (m, 5H), 5.81 (m, 1H), 5.22–5.09 (m, 2H), 4.73 (m, 1H), 2.60–2.43 (m, 2H), 2.22–2.17 (brs, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.1, 134.7, 128.6, 127.7, 126.0, 118.6, 73.5, 44.0. 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-buten-1-ol: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.31–7.24 (m, 2H), 6.92–6.84 (m, 2H), 5.80 (m, 1H), 5.17 (m, 1H), 5.15–5.08 (m, 1H), 4.69 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.54–2.46 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.2, 136.3, 134.8, 127.3, 118.3, 114.0, 73.2, 55.5, 43.9. 1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-buten-1-ol: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.23 (m, 2H), 5.86–5.70 (m, 1H), 5.23–5.12 (m, 2H), 4.76 (m, 1H), 2.60–2.38 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.0, 142.5, 134.2, 133.9, 128.8, 127.4, 126.3, 119.4, 119.1, 72.7, 44.1.