From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Ramakrishna Saripalli <rsaripal@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: bsd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add PSF mitigation kernel parameters
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:04:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c688fc7-67df-3187-54b2-bf20e510fb39@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421090117.22315-5-rsaripal@amd.com>
Hi,
On 4/21/21 2:01 AM, Ramakrishna Saripalli wrote:
> From: Ramakrishna Saripalli <rk.saripalli@amd.com>
>
> PSF mitigation introduces a new kernel parameter called
> predict_store_fwd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramakrishna Saripalli<rk.saripalli@amd.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 04545725f187..58f6bd02385b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3940,6 +3940,11 @@
> Format: {"off"}
> Disable Hardware Transactional Memory
>
> + predict_store_fwd [X86] This option controls PSF mitigation
> + off - Turns on PSF mitigation.
> + on - Turns off PSF mitigation.
> + default : on.
This should be formatted more like:
+ predict_store_fwd= [X86] This option controls PSF mitigation
+ off - Turns on PSF mitigation.
+ on - Turns off PSF mitigation.
+ default: on.
But why does "off" turn it on and "on" turn it off?
> +
> preempt= [KNL]
> Select preemption mode if you have CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> none - Limited to cond_resched() calls
>
thanks.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 9:01 [PATCH 0/4] Introduce support for PSF mitigation Ramakrishna Saripalli
2021-04-21 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Define feature bits to support mitigation of PSF Ramakrishna Saripalli
2021-04-21 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/speculation: Introduce SPEC_CTRL_MSR bit for PSFD Ramakrishna Saripalli
2021-04-21 9:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/speculation: Implement PSF mitigation support Ramakrishna Saripalli
2021-04-21 9:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add PSF mitigation kernel parameters Ramakrishna Saripalli
2021-04-21 16:04 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2021-04-21 18:32 ` Bandan Das
2021-04-21 18:36 ` Saripalli, RK
2021-04-21 18:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-21 18:55 ` Saripalli, RK
2021-04-21 18:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-21 19:05 ` Saripalli, RK
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c688fc7-67df-3187-54b2-bf20e510fb39@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rsaripal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).