Abstract
The higher education system in Nepal has witnessed major achievements and challenges in the past few decades. This paper takes stock of the way the system has evolved and is now mismanaged, with a particular attention to the overall structure, financial management, quality control, and human resources that are central to fulfilling its societal promise. Given that these challenges have been a by-product of an evolving process of policy formation drawing from both global forces and local contexts, this analysis explains how the country has arrived at the current policy of “reluctant privatization” using path dependence and Advocacy Coalition Framework. Whereas the Government of Nepal is at a crossroads in reforming higher education, the insights from this analysis help students, researchers, and policymakers better understand the stakes involved and the potential fault lines that have occurred in its evolving historical context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is based on the chronology of years in which universities were established by using various university websites and news sources. Bhatta (2015) also provides an overview of these historical developments in Nepal.
A probe conducted by the National Vigilante Centre, for example, showed 12 medical colleges throughout the country overcharged students by nearly NRS. 3 billion between 2015 and 2018 (Shrestha, 2019).
News media regularly report the misuse of authority in granting affiliations or authorizations. In a recent case, for example, a legal action was sought against the vice chancellor of TU and other 42 officials for “awarding affiliations to medical institutes that had breached the criteria set by the government, universities, and the Nepal Medical Council” (Sapkota, 2018).
Whereas the enrollment increased by 50 percent between 2008 and 2015, the public investment in higher education essentially stagnated at less than one-third of one percent of GDP on an annual basis, with the actual higher education budget relative to the overall national budget declining much further from the historical level of around 1.5 percent (UGC, 2016).
There were no assistant professors reported for Tribhuvan University.
Neither the Higher Secondary Education Act of 2046 (1989) nor the more recent Act Relating to Compulsory and Free Education of 2075 (2018) explicitly deals with higher education.
In simple terms, path dependence suggests that outcomes determined by such rationally justified random process as equal probability (like selecting a ball) can lead to uneven concentration of chances when the returns are put back into the equation. Hence, future outcomes always follow some predetermined path (Arthur, 1994).
Using the QWERTY keyboard as an example that is now universally embraced, David (1985) argued that today’s choice just followed what happened to the development of keyboards historically.
Whereas Tribhuvan University was founded in 1959 by bringing all of the otherwise independent colleges under one umbrella, the early 1980s marked the period in which colleges operating especially with community (nonprofit) resources were also granted an affiliation to instruct (Nepal Education Commission, 1992).
While higher education has not received much attention in the traditional supports provided by the World Bank and other development partners, some support has targeted this sector as well. The loan assistance of US$65 million announced in 2015 and US$60 million announced in 2021 are two examples where higher education has received exclusive focus (World Bank, 2015, 2021).
The government expenditures on higher education, for example, remained one percent of the gross domestic product during the eight years ending in 2014/2015 even when the overall national budget increased from 21 percent of the gross domestic product in 2006/2007 to 31 percent in 2014/2015 (UGC, 2016).
Moreover, as Rappleye and Un (2018) document using the cases of Cambodia and Bangladesh, the World Bank has failed to understand the specific local contexts while attempting to reform higher education using the dominant global model and expectations.
References
ADB. (2015). Innovative strategies in higher education: For accelerated human resource development in South Asia, Nepal. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Adhikari, R. (2019). Private vs. public schools. The Himalayan Times.
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path-Dependency in the Economy. University of Michigan Press.
Beverwijk, J., Goedegebuure, L., & Huisman, J. (2008). Policy change in nascent policy subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 357–377.
Bhatta, P. (2015). Privatization through affiliation: Trajectories of higher education expansion in post-1990 Nepal. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 20(2), 303–333.
Bhoi, D. (2013). Educational privatization and access to higher education: Experiences of scheduled caste students in Odisha. Social Change, 43(3), 341–363.
Chandler, J. A. (2017). Public policy and private interest: Ideas, self-interest, and ethics in public policy. Routledge.
Chen, J. (2011). Beyond human rights and public health: Citizenship issues in harm reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 184–188.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Sage.
Clarke, A. E. (2014). Grounded theory: Critiques, debates, and situational analysis. In A. E. Clarke & K. Charmaz (Eds.), Grounded Theory and Situational Analysis , Volume I: History, Essentials and Debates in Grounded Theory (pp. 225–251). Sage.
Cybermetrics Lab. (2020). Ranking web of universities. https://www.webometrics.info/en/Asia/Nepal%20.
David, P. (1985). Clio and economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 332–337.
den Outer, B., Handley, K., & Price, M. (2013). Situational analysis and mapping for use in education research: A reflexive methodology? Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1504–1521.
Dillas, B., Cui, J., & Trines, S. (2018). Education in Nepal. World Education News+Reviews. https://wenr.wes.org/2018/04/education-in-nepal.
Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S. C. (2019). The political economy of education and skills in South Korea: Democratisation, liberalisation and education reform in comparative perspective. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 168–187.
Ghimire, B. (2018). Privatization in Education: Private Schools Dominate National Education. The Kathmandu Post.
Gupta, A. (2008). International trends and private higher education in India. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 565–594.
Hartley, M., Gopaul, B., Sagintayeva, A., & Apergenova, R. (2016). Learning autonomy: Higher education reform in Kazakhstan. Higher Education, 72, 277–289.
Henry, A., Lubell, M., & McCoy, M. (2011). Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The Case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 419–444.
Higher Secondary Education Act, 2046. (1989). Accessed on February 12, 2020, http://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/archives/category/documents/law-archives/statutes-acts-law-archives/higher-secondary-education-act-2046-1989
Holzhacker, D., Chornoivan, O., Yazilitas, D., & Dayan-Ochir, K. (2009). Privatization in higher education: Cross-country analysis of trends, policies, problems, and solutions. Institute for Higher Education Policy Issue Brief 03200903.
Hunt, S. & Boliver, V. (2019). A look at private higher education in the UK. Inside Higher Education.
IMF. (2003). Nepal: Poverty reduction strategy paper. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Country Report # 03/305.
IMF. (2007). Nepal: Poverty reduction strategy paper progress report. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Country Report # 07/176.
Jang, S., Weible, C. M., & Park, K. (2016). Policy processes in South Korea through the lens of the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 9(3), 274–290.
Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C., & Ingold, K. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. In C. Weible & P. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 135–172). Westview Press.
Johnson, M. A. (2017). Contemporary higher education reform in Ecuador: Implications for faculty recruitment, hiring, and retention. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(68), 1–16.
Jowi, J. O. (2009). Internationalization of higher education in Africa: Developments, emerging trends, issues and policy implications. Higher Education Policy, 22, 263–281.
Jun, J. C., & Harman, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 1–13.
Kalenda, J. (2016). Situational analysis as a framework for interdisciplinary research in the social sicnences. Human Affairs, 26, 340–355.
Khanal, R. (2019). Nepal’s unemployment rate estimated at 11.4 percent. The Kathmandu Post.
Khelifi, S. (2019). Interplay between politics and institution in higher education reform. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 671–681.
Kolbel, A. (2017). Nepal’s educated nonelite: Reevaluating state-provided higher education. In M. Shah & G. Whiteford (Eds.), Bridges, Pathways, and Transitions (pp. 173–188). New York: Elsevier.
Lanford, M. (2016). Perceptions of higher education reform in Hong Kong: A glocalisation perspective. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 18(3), 184–204.
Lasswell, H. (1951). The policy orientation. In H. Lasswell & D. Lerner (Eds.), The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method (pp. 3–14). Stanford University Press.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service (30th ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2010). Decentralization of higher education and its implications for educational autonomy in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 127–139.
Luke, C. (2005). Capital and knowledge flows: Global higher education markets. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(2), 159–174.
Mok, J. K. H., & Lee, M. H. H. (2003). Globalization or glocalization? Higher education reforms in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 23(1), 15–42.
Mok, K.-H. (2000). Reflecting globalization effects on local policy: Higher education reform in Taiwan. Journal of Education Policy, 15(6), 637–660.
Mok, K.-H. (2013). The quest for an entrepreneurial university in East Asia: Impact on academics and administrators in higher education. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 14, 11–22.
National Education Commission. (1992). Report of the national education commission, 1992. Kathmandu, Nepal: NEC.
Nepal Law Commission. (2018). The act relating to compulsory and free education, 2075 (2018—Act No. 16). Government of Nepal, Kathmandu.
National Planning Commission. (1992). The eighth plan 1992–1997. Kathmandu, Nepal: NPC.
Neves, V. (2004). Situational analysis beyond ‘single-exit modeling. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(6), 921–936.
Nikku, B. (2020). Hidden privatization in higher education in Nepal: Problems and possibilities. In K. Bista, S. Sharma, & R. Raby (Eds.), Higher Education in Nepal: Policies and Perspectives (pp. 249–261). Routledge.
Pérez, M. S., & Cannella, G. S. (2013). Situational analysis as an avenue for critical qualitative research: Mapping post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(7), 505–517.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Cambridge University Press.
Ra, S., & Joshi, R. (2018). Higher education systems and institutions, Nepal. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixerira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer.
Rappleye, J. (2011). Catalyzing educational development or institutionalizing external influence? Donors, civil society, and educational policy formation in Nepal. Globalization Societies and Education, 9(1), 27–49.
Rappleye, J., & Un, L. (2018). What drives failed policy at the World Bank? An inside account of new aid modalities to higher education: Context, blame, and infallibility. Comparative Education, 54(2), 250–274.
Ravi, S., Gupta, N., & Nagaraj, P. (2019). Reviving higher education in India. Brookings India Research Paper # 112019-01.
Regmi, K. (2019). Higher education in Nepal: A handmaiden of neoliberal instrumentalism. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00138-0
Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 189–222). Westview Press.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview Press.
Sapkota, R. (2018). Legal action against TU VC, 42 others on ANVIL. The Himalayan Times.
Scott, I. (2012). Analyzing advocacy issues in Asia. Administration and Society, 44(6), 4–12.
Shapiro, H. (2005). A Larger Sense of Purpose: Higher Education and Society. Princeton University Press.
Shin, J. C., & Harmon, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: global and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 1–13.
Shrestha, P. (2019). Medical colleges charged extra fees of nearly Rs. 3 billion in three years, a new report says. The Kathmandu Post.
Thapa, A. (2015). Public and private school performance in Nepal: An snalysis using the SLC examination. Journal of Education Economics, 23(1), 47–62.
Torfing, J. (2009). Rethinking path dependence in public policy research. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 70–83.
UGC. (2016). Education management information system: Report on higher education 2014/15 A.D. (2071/72 B.S.) Nepal. Bhaktapur, Nepal: University Grants Commission.
Upadhyay, J. (2018). Higher education in Nepal. Pravaha Journal, 20, 96–108.
Wagle, U. (2000). The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation. Policy Sciences, 33(2), 207–223.
Wit, H. (2018). The bologna process and the wider world of higher education: The cooperation competition paradox in a period of increased nationalism. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies (pp. 15–22). Springer.
World Bank. (2015). World Bank approves financing for Nepal higher education reforms project (press release). Source: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/02/19/world-bank-approves-financing-for-nepal-higher-education-reforms-project
World Bank. (2019). World development indicators online. Source: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
World Bank. (2021). World Bank approves $60 million to strengthen Nepal’s higher education (press release). Source: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/06/11/world-bank-approves-60-million-to-strengthen-nepal-s-higher-education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagle, U. Reluctant privatization: assessing the higher education context and policy formation in Nepal. Educ Res Policy Prac 21, 339–355 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09308-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09308-7