__alloc_size(1) issue with __kmalloc_track_caller #1599

nickdesaulniers · 2022-02-18T17:19:09Z

via https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/1916426

the upstream patch was broken up into pieces because the resulting devices (x86 and arm64 failed to boot).

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/ was sent as a partial revert revert.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/commit/?h=for-5.17/fixup5&id=aae5518e45964afa48e02bd5df68b029bc15c783

kees · 2022-02-20T00:14:01Z

Forwarding details from some internal Android investigations: the problem appears to be the use of __malloc here. (Swapping _alloc_size with __alloc_size__ fixes it.)

Another idea is a possible poor interaction with ksize() (which returns the true rounded up kmalloc size) vs the compiler's view of the size returned due to __alloc_size.

Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org

commit 93dd04a upstream. Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

kees · 2022-02-25T21:05:14Z

@melver Seems like fixing ksize() is the way to go here?

kees · 2022-02-25T21:20:17Z

Perhaps something like this? But this doesn't build correctly yet. Hmm...

0001-mm-Handle-ksize-vs-__alloc_size-by-forgetting-size.patch.txt

kees · 2022-02-25T22:17:19Z

Ah, here, this seems to fix it for me:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220225221625.3531852-1-keescook@chromium.org

If ksize() is used on an allocation, the compiler cannot make any assumptions about its size any more (as hinted by __alloc_size). Force it to forget. One caller was using a container_of() construction that needed to be worked around. Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: ClangBuiltLinux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

commit 93dd04a upstream. Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org

In the effort to help the compiler reason about buffer sizes, the __alloc_size attribute was added to allocators. This improves the scope of the compiler's ability to apply CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and (in the near future) CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. For most allocations, this works well, as the vast majority of callers are not expecting to use more memory than what they asked for. There is, however, one common exception to this: anticipatory resizing of kmalloc allocations. These cases all use ksize() to determine the actual bucket size of a given allocation (e.g. 128 when 126 was asked for). This comes in two styles in the kernel: 1) An allocation has been determined to be too small, and needs to be resized. Instead of the caller choosing its own next best size, it wants to minimize the number of calls to krealloc(), so it just uses ksize() plus some additional bytes, forcing the realloc into the next bucket size, from which it can learn how large it is now. For example: data = krealloc(data, ksize(data) + 1, gfp); data_len = ksize(data); 2) The minimum size of an allocation is calculated, but since it may grow in the future, just use all the space available in the chosen bucket immediately, to avoid needing to reallocate later. A good example of this is skbuff's allocators: data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc); ... /* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested. * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone, * to allow max possible filling before reallocation. */ osize = ksize(data); size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize); In both cases, the "how much was actually allocated?" question is answered _after_ the allocation, where the compiler hinting is not in an easy place to make the association any more. This mismatch between the compiler's view of the buffer length and the code's intention about how much it is going to actually use has already caused problems[1]. It is possible to fix this by reordering the use of the "actual size" information. We can serve the needs of users of ksize() and still have accurate buffer length hinting for the compiler by doing the bucket size calculation _before_ the allocation. Code can instead ask "how large an allocation would I get for a given size?". Introduce kmalloc_size_roundup(), to serve this function so we can start replacing the "anticipatory resizing" uses of ksize(). [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 KSPP/linux#183 Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

In the effort to help the compiler reason about buffer sizes, the __alloc_size attribute was added to allocators. This improves the scope of the compiler's ability to apply CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and (in the near future) CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. For most allocations, this works well, as the vast majority of callers are not expecting to use more memory than what they asked for. There is, however, one common exception to this: anticipatory resizing of kmalloc allocations. These cases all use ksize() to determine the actual bucket size of a given allocation (e.g. 128 when 126 was asked for). This comes in two styles in the kernel: 1) An allocation has been determined to be too small, and needs to be resized. Instead of the caller choosing its own next best size, it wants to minimize the number of calls to krealloc(), so it just uses ksize() plus some additional bytes, forcing the realloc into the next bucket size, from which it can learn how large it is now. For example: data = krealloc(data, ksize(data) + 1, gfp); data_len = ksize(data); 2) The minimum size of an allocation is calculated, but since it may grow in the future, just use all the space available in the chosen bucket immediately, to avoid needing to reallocate later. A good example of this is skbuff's allocators: data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc); ... /* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested. * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone, * to allow max possible filling before reallocation. */ osize = ksize(data); size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize); In both cases, the "how much was actually allocated?" question is answered _after_ the allocation, where the compiler hinting is not in an easy place to make the association any more. This mismatch between the compiler's view of the buffer length and the code's intention about how much it is going to actually use has already caused problems[1]. It is possible to fix this by reordering the use of the "actual size" information. We can serve the needs of users of ksize() and still have accurate buffer length hinting for the compiler by doing the bucket size calculation _before_ the allocation. Code can instead ask "how large an allocation would I get for a given size?". Introduce kmalloc_size_roundup(), to serve this function so we can start replacing the "anticipatory resizing" uses of ksize(). [1] ClangBuiltLinux#1599 KSPP#183 [ vbabka@suse.cz: add SLOB version ] Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

…k_caller Commit f78a03f ("mm/slab_common: remove CONFIG_NUMA ifdefs for common kmalloc functions") added back the __alloc_size(1) attribute to __kmalloc_node_track_caller() which was removed in commit 93dd04a ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller") due to causing a kernal panic when using the clang compiler. Let's remove it again since we are hitting the same kernel panic. The Clang team is still investigating this issue. Refer to ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 for more details. Bug: 220186325 Signed-off-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com> Change-Id: I2ca64ab68e7c96032924f0ee2bc00a32db1c19f7

Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (cherry picked from 93dd04a) Orabug: 34717841 Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com> (cherry picked from commit cc342248e2877e7f2ce7caf7bf043a80a754e49c) Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>

In the effort to help the compiler reason about buffer sizes, the __alloc_size attribute was added to allocators. This improves the scope of the compiler's ability to apply CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and (in the near future) CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. For most allocations, this works well, as the vast majority of callers are not expecting to use more memory than what they asked for. There is, however, one common exception to this: anticipatory resizing of kmalloc allocations. These cases all use ksize() to determine the actual bucket size of a given allocation (e.g. 128 when 126 was asked for). This comes in two styles in the kernel: 1) An allocation has been determined to be too small, and needs to be resized. Instead of the caller choosing its own next best size, it wants to minimize the number of calls to krealloc(), so it just uses ksize() plus some additional bytes, forcing the realloc into the next bucket size, from which it can learn how large it is now. For example: data = krealloc(data, ksize(data) + 1, gfp); data_len = ksize(data); 2) The minimum size of an allocation is calculated, but since it may grow in the future, just use all the space available in the chosen bucket immediately, to avoid needing to reallocate later. A good example of this is skbuff's allocators: data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc); ... /* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested. * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone, * to allow max possible filling before reallocation. */ osize = ksize(data); size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize); In both cases, the "how much was actually allocated?" question is answered _after_ the allocation, where the compiler hinting is not in an easy place to make the association any more. This mismatch between the compiler's view of the buffer length and the code's intention about how much it is going to actually use has already caused problems[1]. It is possible to fix this by reordering the use of the "actual size" information. We can serve the needs of users of ksize() and still have accurate buffer length hinting for the compiler by doing the bucket size calculation _before_ the allocation. Code can instead ask "how large an allocation would I get for a given size?". Introduce kmalloc_size_roundup(), to serve this function so we can start replacing the "anticipatory resizing" uses of ksize(). [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 KSPP/linux#183 [ vbabka@suse.cz: add SLOB version ] Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (cherry picked from 93dd04a) Orabug: 34717841 Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com> (cherry picked from commit cc342248e2877e7f2ce7caf7bf043a80a754e49c) Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>

…k_caller Commit f78a03f ("mm/slab_common: remove CONFIG_NUMA ifdefs for common kmalloc functions") added back the __alloc_size(1) attribute to __kmalloc_node_track_caller() which was removed in commit 93dd04a ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller") due to causing a kernal panic when using the clang compiler. Let's remove it again since we are hitting the same kernel panic. The Clang team is still investigating this issue. Refer to ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 for more details. Bug: 220186325 Signed-off-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com> Change-Id: I2ca64ab68e7c96032924f0ee2bc00a32db1c19f7 Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <joneslee@google.com>

Commit c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") added __alloc_size attributes to a bunch of kmalloc function prototypes. Unfortunately the change to __kmalloc_track_caller seems to cause clang to generate broken code and the first time this is called when booting, the box will crash. While the compiler problems are being reworked and attempted to be solved [1], let's just drop the attribute to solve the issue now. Once it is resolved it can be added back. [1] ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1599 Fixes: c37495d ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220218131358.3032912-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (cherry picked from 93dd04a) Orabug: 34717841 Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com> (cherry picked from commit cc342248e2877e7f2ce7caf7bf043a80a754e49c) Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>

nickdesaulniers added [BUG] Untriaged Something isn't working [ARCH] arm64 This bug impacts ARCH=arm64 [ARCH] x86_64 This bug impacts ARCH=x86_64 labels Feb 18, 2022

kees added the [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review label Feb 25, 2022

kees self-assigned this Feb 25, 2022

kees mentioned this issue Sep 20, 2022

Deal with kmalloc vs ksize vs __alloc_size KSPP/linux#183

Open

13 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

__alloc_size(1) issue with __kmalloc_track_caller #1599

__alloc_size(1) issue with __kmalloc_track_caller #1599

nickdesaulniers commented Feb 18, 2022 •

edited

kees commented Feb 20, 2022

kees commented Feb 25, 2022

kees commented Feb 25, 2022 •

edited

kees commented Feb 25, 2022

__alloc_size(1) issue with __kmalloc_track_caller #1599

__alloc_size(1) issue with __kmalloc_track_caller #1599

Comments

nickdesaulniers commented Feb 18, 2022 • edited

kees commented Feb 20, 2022

kees commented Feb 25, 2022

kees commented Feb 25, 2022 • edited

kees commented Feb 25, 2022

nickdesaulniers commented Feb 18, 2022 •

edited

kees commented Feb 25, 2022 •

edited