Abstract
Prediction of turbulent flow is required for design and assessment of clarifier systems that have been implemented throughout history to treat water in the urban water cycle through physical clarification. Yet, turbulent flow modeling is a relatively new tool that has not existed until the last half-century and can be, and often is, a tenuous component in a computational fluid dynamics simulation of unit operations and processes. Common Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equation (RANS) approaches can be inadequate to obtain consistent and accurate flow solutions. In contrast, this study presents an application of large-eddy simulations (LES) for a clarification system with a high-order spectral element method employing 48 million degrees of freedom. Turbulent and unsteady flow characteristics are investigated, and statistics are examined for such a system. Simulation results are compared with laser Doppler anemometry measurements for mean flow velocity, turbulence kinetic energy, and Reynolds shear stress. LES results agree well with measurements, and the differences between LES and measurements are generally less than the reported measurement error. LES results capture the transition behavior from a jet-like flow at the near-inlet region to an open-channel flow at the downstream end of the system. Furthermore, LES results reveal that the widely adopted log-law of a classical turbulent boundary layer is not established in the system even at the most downstream location. Preliminary examination of commonly used RANS models identifies the challenges in application of RANS to such systems. The results from this study provide a benchmark for turbulence modeling of common water clarification systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achari, A.M., Das, M.K.: Application of various RANS based models towards predicting turbulent slot jet impingement. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 98, 332–351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.07.018
Adams, E.W., Rodi, W.: Modeling flow and mixing in sedimentation tanks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 116(7), 895–913 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:7(895)
Ahlman, D., Brethouwer, G., Johansson, A.V.: Direct numerical simulation of a plane turbulent wall-jet including scalar mixing. Phys. Fluids 19(6), 065102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2732460
AlSammarraee, M., Chan, A.: Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part 2: the effects of baffles. Chem. Eng. J. 152(2–3), 315–321 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.052
Al-Sammarraee, M., Chan, A., Salim, S.M., Mahabaleswar, U.S.: Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part I: particle settling performance. Chem. Eng. J. 152(2–3), 307–314 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.062
Aref, H., Balachandar, S.: A First Course in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823736
Asgharzadeh, H., Firoozabadi, B., Afshin, H.: Experimental investigation of effects of baffle configurations on the performance of a secondary sedimentation tank. Sci. Iran. 18(4B), 938–949 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.07.005
Bardina, J.E., Huang, P.G., Coakley, T.J.: Turbulence modeling validation. In: 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA (1997). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-2121
Batchelor, G.K.: An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800955
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M.Y., Quarteroni, A., Zang, T.A.: Spectral Methods in Fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84108-8
Chakraborty, P., Balachandar, S., Adrian, R.J.: On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. J. Fluid Mech. 535, 189–214 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005004726
Chen, H.C., Patel, V.C.: Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA J. 26(6), 641–648 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9948
Craft, T.J., Iacovides, H., Yoon, J.H.: Progress in the use of non-linear two-equation models in the computation of convective heat-transfer in impinging and separated flows. Flow Turbul. Combust. 63(1), 59–80 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009973923473
Eaton, J.K.: Turbulent flow reattachment: an experimental study of the flow and structure behind a backward-facing step. Stanford University Report, pp. MD-39 (1980)
Fischer, P., Mullen, J.: Stabilisation par filtrage pour la méthode des éléments spectraux. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences-Series I: Mathematics (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4442(00)01763-8
Fischer, P.F.: An overlapping Schwarz method for spectral element solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 133(1), 84–101 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1997.5651
Fornari, W., Zade, S., Brandt, L., Picano, F.: Settling of finite-size particles in turbulence at different volume fractions. Acta Mech. 230(2), 413–430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-018-2269-1
Fröhlich, J., Mellen, C.P., Rodi, W., Temmerman, L., Leschziner, M.A.: Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 19–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004002812
Gao, H., Stenstrom, M.K.: Evaluation of three turbulence models in predicting the steady state hydrodynamics of a secondary sedimentation tank. Water Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.067
Garofalo, G., Sansalone, J.J.: Transient elution of particulate matter from hydrodynamic unit operations as a function of computational parameters and runoff hydrograph unsteadiness. Chem. Eng. J. 175(1), 150–159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.086
Garofalo, G., Sansalone, J.J.: Urban drainage clarifier load-response as a function of flow, unsteadiness, and baffling. J. Environ. Eng. 144(3), 04017108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001283
Goodarzi, D., Lari, K.S., Alighardashi, A.: A large eddy simulation study to assess low-speed wind and baffle orientation effects in a water treatment sedimentation basin. Water Sci. Technol. 2017(2), 412–421 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.171
Hinterberger, C., Fröhlich, J., Rodi, W.: 2D and 3D turbulent fluctuations in open channel flow with Re \(\tau \) = 590 studied by large eddy simulation. Flow Turbul. Combust. 80(2), 225–253 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-007-9122-2
Hussain, A.K.M.F., Reynolds, W.C.: The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41(2), 241–258 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112070000605
Imam, E., McCorquodale, J.A.: Simulation of flow in rectangular clarifiers. J. Environ. Eng. 109(3), 713–730 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1983)109:3(713)
Imam, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Bewtra, J.K.: Numerical modeling of sedimentation tanks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 109(12), 1740–1754 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:12(1740)
Jamshidnia, H., Firoozabadi, B.: Experimental investigation of baffle effect on the flow in a rectangular primary sedimentation tank. Sci. Iran. 17(4) (2010)
Jaramillo, J.E., Pérez-Segarra, C.D., Rodriguez, I., Oliva, A.: Numerical study of plane and round impinging jets using RANS models. Numer. Heat Transf. Part B Fund. 54(3), 213–237 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10407790802289938
Kaltenbach, H.J., Janke, G.: Direct numerical simulation of flow separation behind a swept, rearward-facing step at Re(H) = 3000. Phys. Fluids 12(9), 2320–2337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1287338
Karpinska, A.M., Bridgeman, J.: CFD-aided modelling of activated sludge systems–a critical review. Water Res. 88, 861–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.008
Kim, D., Kim, D.I., Kim, J.H., Stoesser, T.: Large eddy simulation of flow and tracer transport in multichamber ozone contactors. J. Environ. Eng. 136(1), 22–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000118
Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R.: Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087000892
Kolmogorov, A.N.: Dissipation of energy in the locally isotropic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 434(1890), 15–17 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0076
Komminaho, J., Skote, M.: Reynolds stress budgets in Couette and boundary layer flows. Flow Turbul. Combust. 68(2), 167–192 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020404706293
Launder, B., Spalding, D.: The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 3(2), 269–289 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
Le, H., Moin, P., Kim, J.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 349–374 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096003941
Li, H., Sansalone, J.J.: CFD as a complementary tool to benchmark physical testing of PM separation by unit operations. J. Environ. Eng. 146(11), 04020122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001803
Li, H., Sansalone, J.J.: CFD model of PM sedimentation and resuspension in urban water clarification. J. Environ. Eng. 146(3), 04019118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001649
Li, H., Sansalone, J.J.: Multi-scale physical model simulation of particle filtration using computational fluid dynamics. J. Environ. Manag. 271, 111021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111021
Liu, B., Ma, J., Luo, L., Bai, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, J.: Two-dimensional LDV measurement, modeling, and optimal design of rectangular primary settling tanks. J. Environ. Eng. 136(5), 501–507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000186
Liu, K., Lakhote, M., Balachandar, S.: Self-induced temperature correction for inter-phase heat transfer in Euler-Lagrange point-particle simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 396, 596–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.069
Liu, K., Zgheib, N., Balachandar, S.: On the spreading of non-canonical thermals from direct numerical simulations. Phys. Fluids 32(2), 026602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138981
Liu, X., García, M.H.: Three-dimensional numerical model with free water surface and mesh deformation for local sediment scour. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 134(4), 203–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2008)134:4(203)
Liu, X., García, M.H.: Computational fluid dynamics modeling for the design of large primary settling tanks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 137(3), 343–355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000313
Liu, X., Zhang, J.: Computational fluid dynamics: applications in water, wastewater, and stormwater treatment: EWRI computational fluid dynamics task committee. American Society of Civil Engineers (2019). https://books.google.com/books?id=cwDBwgEACAAJ
Lyn, D.A., Einav, S., Rodi, W., Park, J.H.: A laser-Doppler velocimetry study of ensemble-averaged characteristics of the turbulent near wake of a square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 304, 285–319 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095004435
Lyn, D.A., Rodi, W.: Turbulence measurements in model settling tank. J. Hydraul. Eng. 116(1), 3–21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(3)
Marchioli, C.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent dispersed flows: a review of modelling approaches. Acta Mech. 228(3), 741–771 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1803-x
Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., Langtry, R.: Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbul. Heat Mass Transf. 4(1), 625–632 (2003)
Naqavi, I.Z., Tyacke, J.C., Tucker, P.G.: Direct numerical simulation of a wall jet: flow physics. J. Fluid Mech. 852, 507–542 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.503
Ouro, P., Fraga, B., Viti, N., Angeloudis, A., Stoesser, T., Gualtieri, C.: Instantaneous transport of a passive scalar in a turbulent separated flow. Environ. Fluid Mech. 18(2), 487–513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9567-3
Peng, L., Nielsen, P.V., Wang, X., Sadrizadeh, S., Liu, L., Li, Y.: Possible user-dependent CFD predictions of transitional flow in building ventilation. Build. Environ. 99, 130–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.01.014
Pereira, J.C., SchöNung, B.: Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 473–496 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083002839
Pont-Vílchez, A., Trias, F.X., Gorobets, A., Oliva, A.: Direct numerical simulation of backward-facing step flow at Re \(\tau \) = 395 and expansion ratio 2. J. Fluid Mech. 863, 341–363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.1000
Pope, S.B.: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840531
Razmi, A., Bakhtyar, R., Firoozabadi, B., Barry, D.: Experiments and numerical modeling of baffle configuration effects on the performance of sedimentation tanks. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40(2), 140–150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0176
Rodi, W.: Comparison of LES and RANS calculations of the flow around bluff bodies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 69–71, 55–75 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00147-5
Rodi, W., Ferziger, J.H., Breuer, M., Pourquié, M.: Status of large eddy simulation: results of a workshop. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 119(2), 248–262 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2819128
Saeedi, E., Behnamtalab, E., Salehi Neyshabouri, S.A.A.: Numerical simulation of baffle effect on the performance of sedimentation basin. Water Environ. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12454
Salinas, J., Balachandar, S., Shringarpure, M., Fedele, J., Hoyal, D., Cantero, M.: Soft transition between subcritical and supercritical currents through intermittent cascading interfacial instabilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2008959117
Schäfer, F., Breuer, M., Durst, F.: The dynamics of the transitional flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 85–119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008005235
Schlatter, P., Stolz, S., Kleiser, L.: LES of transitional flows using the approximate deconvolution model. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 25(3), 549–558 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.02.020
Stamou, A.I.: On the prediction of flow and mixing in settling tanks using a curvature-modified k-\(\epsilon \) model. Appl. Math. Model. (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(91)90060-3
Stamou, A.I., Adams, E.W., Rodi, W.: Numerical modeling of flow and settling in primary rectangular clarifiers. J. Hydraul. Res. 27(5), 665–682 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499117
Stolz, S., Adams, N.A.: An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 11(7), 1699–1701 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869867
Tamayol, A., Firoozabadi, B., Ahmadi, G.: Effects of inlet position and baffle configuration on hydraulic performance of primary settling tanks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 134(7), 1004–1009 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:7(1004)
Taylor, G.I.: The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 164(919), 476–490 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0032
Tsukahara, T., Seki, Y., Kawamura, H., Tochio, D.: DNS of turbulent channel flow at very low Reynolds numbers. In: TSFP Digital Library Online. Begel House Inc. (2005)
Wang, H., Falconer, R.: Simulating disinfection processes in chlorine contact tanks using various turbulence models and high-order accurate difference schemes. Water Res. 32(5), 1529–1543 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)80014-6
Wilcox, D.C.: Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd edn. DCW Industries (2006)
Wolfshtein, M.: The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 12(3), 301–318 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(69)90012-X
Wu, X.: Inflow turbulence generation methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49(1), 23–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060322
Yildiz, M.A., Yuan, H., Merzari, E., Hassan, Y.: Numerical simulation of isothermal flow across slant five-tube bundle with spectral element method code Nek5000. Nucl. Technol. 206(2), 296–306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1626176
Zhang, J., Tejada-Martínez, A.E., Zhang, Q.: Developments in computational fluid dynamics-based modeling for disinfection technologies over the last two decades: a review (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.003
Zhang, J., Tejada-Martínez, A.E., Zhang, Q., Lei, H.: Evaluating hydraulic and disinfection efficiencies of a full-scale ozone contactor using a RANS-based modeling framework. Water Res. 52, 155–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2013.12.037
Zhiyin, Y.: Large-eddy simulation: past, present and the future (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.007
Zhou, J., Adrian, R.J., Balachandar, S., Kendall, T.M.: Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209900467X
Zhou, S., McCorquodale, J.A.: Modeling of rectangular settling tanks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 118(10), 1391–1405 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:10(1391)
Zwick, D., Balachandar, S.: A scalable Euler-Lagrange approach for multiphase flow simulation on spectral elements. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 34(3), 316–339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342019867756
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (mp4 43518 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Balachandar, S. & Sansalone, J. Large-eddy simulation of flow turbulence in clarification systems. Acta Mech 232, 1389–1412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02914-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02914-1