Amphiphilic cyclic peptide [W4KR5]-Antibiotics combinations as broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114278Get rights and content

Highlights

  • [W4KR5] and [W4KR5]-meropenem covalent conjugate were synthesized.

  • MICs were evaluated against non-resistant and multi-drug resistant strains.

  • Time-kill kinetics assay indicated the time-dependent synergistic effect.

  • Combination therapy enhanced the efficacy of commercial antibiotics.

  • Flow cytometry analysis indicated the membrane disruption mechanism.

Abstract

Linear and cyclic amphiphilic peptides, (W4KR5) and [W4KR5], were evaluated as antibacterial agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including four multi-drug resistant strains and the corresponding four non-resistant strains. Cyclic peptide [W4KR5] showed higher antibacterial activity than the linear (W4KR5) counterpart. Cyclic [W4KR5] was subjected to combination (physical mixture or covalent conjugation) with meropenem as a model antibiotic to study the impact of the combination on antimicrobial activity. A physical mixture of meropenem and [W4KR5] showed synergistic antibacterial activity against Gram-negative P. aeruginosa (ATCC BAA-1744) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27883) strains. [W4KR5] was further subjected to extensive antibacterial studies against additional 10 bacteria strains, showing significant antibacterial efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria strains. Combinations studies of [W4KR5] with an additional 9 commercially available antibiotics showed significant enhancement in antibacterial activity for all tested combinations, especially with tetracycline, tobramycin, levofloxacin, clindamycin, daptomycin, polymyxin, kanamycin, and vancomycin. Time-kill kinetics assay and flow cytometry results exhibited that [W4KR5] had a time-dependent synergistic effect and membrane disruption property. These data indicate that [W4KR5] improves the antibacterial activity, presumably by facilitating the internalization of antibiotics and their interaction with the intracellular targets. This study introduces a potential strategy for treating multidrug-resistant pathogens by combining [W4KR5] and a variety of classical antibiotics to improve the antibacterial effectiveness.

Introduction

The rise and spread of bacterial resistance have become one of the most serious public health crises and a major challenge for the scientific community. Over-prescribing antibiotics, unnecessary and inappropriate use of antibiotics and poor infection control in hospitals and clinics are the leading cause of bacterial resistance that result in the generation of super bacteria [[1], [2], [3]]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), antibiotic resistance causes millions of illnesses worldwide every year, the number estimated to reach tens of millions by 2050 [4]. Among the major threats is the Gram-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which causes around 19,000 deaths by year in the U.S.A with a health care cost of $3–4 billion. In recent years, the cases for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) have increased constantly [5]. The discovery of novel therapeutics alternative to commercially available antibiotics is urgently required to fight against or delay bacterial resistance. Several strategies have been applied to address this problem, such as developing new antimicrobial agents [6] and the revival of traditional antibiotics [7], but none of them are ideal.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered promising candidates to fight multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens due to their excellent broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and unique non-specific bacterial membrane rupture mechanism, which does not allow the bacterial pathogens to develop resistance [[8], [9], [10]]. However, some AMPs cross the membrane without destroying it and act on intracellular targets, such as nucleic acids, protein biosynthesis, or protease inhibition [11]. AMPs are direct-acting antibacterial agent that directly inhibiting or killing bacteria without requiring any additional therapy [12]. Positively charged residues of the AMPs help them to accumulate at bacterial membrane surfaces through electrostatic interactions with the anionic phosphate head groups of membrane lipids, leading to membrane damage, cytoplasmic leakage, membrane depolarization and lysis, and cell death [8,13,14]. Modulation of the efficacy of AMPs via covalent conjugation with antibiotics is one of the strategies that is expected to increase antibacterial activity and decrease administration dose, leading to lowering the risk for adverse side effects [[15], [16], [17], [18]]. They were also found to be effective in combination therapy to fight against resistant bacteria [[19], [20], [21], [22]].

Meropenem (1) (Fig. 1), one of the carbapenem class antibiotics, is effective against most Gram-positive, Gram-negative, anaerobic, and even extended beta-lactamase–producing bacteria, and has good cerebrospinal fluid penetration [23,24]. However, meropenem is known to be less effective against New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) positive resistant bacterial strain and other metallo-β-lactamses producing bacteria. We have previously reported cyclic peptide [R4W4] (Fig. 1) containing arginine (Arg, R) and tryptophan (Trp, W) residues in a sequential manner to have antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [[25], [26], [27]]. Moreover, we have previously investigated the conjugation between antibacterial cyclic peptides and antibiotics as an effective approach against bacterial resistance [28].

To improve the utility of [R4W4] as a promising antimicrobial agent, linear and cyclic peptides, (W4KR5) and [W4KR5] (Fig. 1), were successfully synthesized. Parentheses () and brackets [] represent the linear and cyclic peptides, respectively. We hypothesized that with the combination of peptides with antibiotics, the antibacterial activity could improve. Meropenem was used as the model antibiotic in the physical mixture with the peptides. Our goal here was to improve the activity of current antibiotics, including those that have low susceptibility to metallo-β-lactamses producing bacteria, through combination with the antibacterial peptide that has a different mechanism of action, such as targeting bacterial membrane. Furthermore, covalent conjugation of meropenem and [W4KR5] was accomplished to study the impact of conjugation on antimicrobial activity in comparison. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the synthesized compounds along with the physical mixture (meropenem + [W4KR5]) were evaluated using multi-drug resistant strains as well as the corresponding non-resistant strains. Based on these data, combinations studies of [W4KR5] with an additional 9 commercially available antibiotics was accomplished. Then the synergistic and time-killing studies were performed for further understanding of the antimicrobial activity in combination and bactericidal action of the compounds, respectively. Flow cytometry analysis was conducted to study the effect of [W4KR5] on the bacterial cell membrane.

Section snippets

Chemistry

The synthetic procedures for (W4KR5) and [W4KR5] are depicted in Scheme 1. Linear (W4KR5) was synthesized using Fmoc/tBu solid-phase peptide synthesis. [W4KR5] was synthesized after the cleavage of the assembled side-chain-protected linear peptide from the resin, followed by N- to C-cyclization in the solution phase.

The linear peptide containing ordered tryptophan (W), arginine (R), and lysine (K) amino acids (W(Boc)W(Boc)W(Boc)W(Boc)K(Boc)R(Pbf)R(Pbf)R(Pbf)R(Pbf)R(Pbf)) was assembled on the

Conclusion

Amphiphilic peptides (W4KR5) and [W4KR5] were synthesized and evaluated for antibacterial activities. A potent amphiphilic cyclic peptide [W4KR5] was conjugated with meropenem. Antimicrobial activities of the synthesized compounds and the physical mixture of meropenem with [W4KR5] were evaluated as MIC using four multi-drug resistant strains and four non-resistant strains. The results showed that cyclic peptide [W4KR5] had higher antibacterial activity than the linear counterpart, while the

Materials

Arginine-loaded 2 chlorotrityl resin (H-Arg(Pbf)-2-chlorotrityl resin) and Fmoc-amino acid building blocks, Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH, and Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-OH, were obtained from AAPPTec (Louisville, KY, USA). Chemical reagents and solvents were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and used without further purification. Final products were purified using a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) system (LC-20AP) from Shimadzu (Canby, OR, USA), with a

Author contributions

K.P. and R.K.T. planned and designed the experiments; E.H.M.M. performed the chemistry and biological assays (MIC determination, synergistic studies) and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; S.L conducted antibacterial assays against a panel of resistant bacteria, time-kinetic assays, FACS analysis, some synergistic studies, cytotoxicity and hemolytic assays, and HPLC analysis; K.P. and R.K.T. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; K.P., R.K.T., and S.L. contributed to the writing

Funding

This project was supported by funds from AJK Biopharmaceutical and Chapman University (RKT and KP).

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rakesh K. Tiwari, Keykavous Parang reports equipment, drugs, or supplies was provided by AJK Biopharmaceutical. Eman H. M. Mohammed, Sandeep Lohan, Rakesh K. Tiwari, Keykavous Parang has patent Synthetic antimicrobial peptides pending to AJK Biopharmaceutical.

Acknowledgements

The authors also acknowledge the support of the core facility at Chapman University School of Pharmacy.

References (67)

  • A. Giacometti et al.

    In vitro activity of MSI-78 alone and in combination with antibiotics against bacteria responsible for bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients

    Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents

    (2005)
  • G. Maisetta et al.

    In vitro bactericidal activity of the N-terminal fragment of the frog peptide esculentin-1b (Esc 1-18) in combination with conventional antibiotics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

    Peptides

    (2009)
  • G. Rajasekaran et al.

    LL-37-derived membrane-active FK-13 analogs possessing cell selectivity, anti-biofilm activity and synergy with chloramphenicol and anti-inflammatory activity

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.

    (2017)
  • H. Choi et al.

    Synergistic effect of antimicrobial peptide arenicin-1 in combination with antibiotics against pathogenic bacteria

    Res. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • E. Raphael et al.

    Infections caused by antimicrobial drug-resistant saprophytic gram-negative bacteria in the environment

    Front. Med.

    (2017)
  • Z. Golkar et al.

    Bacteriophage therapy: a potential solution for the antibiotic resistance crisis

    J. Infect. Dev. Ctries.

    (2014)
  • N. Mookherjee et al.

    Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2020)
  • X. Li et al.

    Supramolecular antibacterial materials for combatting antibiotic resistance

    Adv. Mater.

    (2019)
  • M.A. Fischbach et al.

    Antibiotics for emerging pathogens

    Science

    (2009)
  • The 10 x '20 Initiative: pursuing a global commitment to develop 10 new antibacterial drugs by 2020

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (2010)
  • N. Cassir et al.

    A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • K.A. Brogden

    Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • N. Raheem et al.

    Mechanisms of action for antimicrobial peptides with antibacterial and antibiofilm functions

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2019)
  • K.W. Woodburn et al.

    Evaluation of the antimicrobial peptide, RP557, for the broad-spectrum treatment of wound pathogens and biofilm

    Front. Microbiol.

    (2019)
  • C.F. Le et al.

    Intracellular targeting mechanisms by antimicrobial peptides

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2017)
  • U. Theuretzbacher et al.

    The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2020)
  • M.N. Melo et al.

    Antimicrobial peptides: linking partition, activity and high membrane-bound concentrations

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • C.J. Arnusch et al.

    Enhanced membrane pore formation through high-affinity targeted antimicrobial peptides

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • K.A. Ghaffar et al.

    Levofloxacin and indolicidin for combination antimicrobial therapy

    Curr. Drug Deliv.

    (2015)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Bacteria-targeting conjugates based on antimicrobial peptide for bacteria diagnosis and therapy

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2015)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Synergistic combination of two antimicrobial agents closing each other's mutant selection windows to prevent antimicrobial resistance

    Sci. Rep.

    (2018)
  • P.D. Tamma et al.

    Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2012)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Antimicrobial peptides, conventional antibiotics, and their synergistic utility for the treatment of drug-resistant infections

    Med. Res. Rev.

    (2022)
  • Cited by (8)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text